Why Not Obama?

If I were a liberal, I think that I would probably be a liberal like Jamelle, who blogs at US Jamerica. He is honest, thoughtful, and respectful. We often disagree on policy, but generally share the same principles in terms of debate. Even before he became part of the WordPress.com Political Blogger Alliance,  I appreciated reading his posts.

He asked me a while ago why I wouldn’t support Barack Obama, and the subject came up again from Chen Zhen after Mike Huckabee withdrew from the GOP race.

So, I’ll go ahead and deal with that question. I’m not beholden to the Republican Party, and I’m not remotely above  supporting a Democrat if I really thought that he was the right guy for the job. In my opinion, though, Sen. Obama just isn’t.

Before I get into why not, though, I’ll go ahead and say what I do like about him. I think that Barack Obama is honest. I think that he believes what he says, which is very different from other politicians, who will say anything to get elected.

The biggest thing that I admire about Sen. Obama is that he is a real person. He does not look down on voters, he does not patronize them. I don’t think that he views voters as commodities — as the things that you have to acquire in order to win the election. He views them as real people, and I’m convinced that he actually cares about having some kind of relationship with the human beings who are also voters.

He is a man of good character. I realize that people are getting up in arms about a flag pin on his lapel, or whether his wife is proud of the US, or whatever else you can complain about. I see him as a generally-decent person. I don’t see an adulterer, a political hack, or any other kind of loathsome human being. I wouldn’t mind at all if Barack and Michelle Obama were my neighbors. This, by the way, puts him in a narrow field of Presidential contenders — Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, and Barack Obama. Certainly not Hillary Clinton. I’ll spare explanations of the rest.

However, there is an ultimate problem with Obama on policy. I can overlook a lot of positions given his character. Ultimately, though, it’s not quite enough just to be a nice and honest person.

I don’t think that Sen. Obama has demonstrated the judgment and experience to be President. He’s still in his first term in the Senate, and hasn’t demonstrated the kind of leadership that I want to see in a President. Sure, he can surround himself with experts on particular issues … but I don’t see his track record in terms of choosing those experts. Where are his credentials for this kind of decision-making? I’m just not convinced that I’ve seen enough of him to trust him.

Also, there is BAIPA. In case you haven’t noticed, I’m pro-life. Sen. Obama isn’t. Beyond being pro-choice, Sen. Obama has come out opposing legislation in Illinois that would have protected children who survive abortions and are born alive. The Born Alive Infant Protection Act passed the US Senate without opposition, even with such anti-abortion zealots as Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy present. The National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) didn’t oppose it.

When the state version, though, was being discussed in Illinois, Barack Obama killed the bill in committee.

There are those who argue that an unborn child is something other than human. Some call them parasites, since they rely on their mothers for life.  However, BAIPA addresses children who can’t possibly be accused of being anything other than human beings. This, I cannot overlook. I cannot possibly back a candidate who would oppose protection for these children.

On almost everything else, I figure that the US will get past anything that a President Obama might do wrong. But I worry for the stain left on this nation by our casual taking of millions and millions of lives. And I simply can’t support a candidate whose respect for life is so limited that he won’t protect even newborns, to say nothing of the unborn.

I no longer have a candidate in this race. I haven’t committed to supporting John McCain just because he’s the Republican candidate,  but I also haven’t yet decided to go to a third party. However, I will not be supporting the Democratic nominee at this point. Hillary Clinton fails the character test, and shows that she doesn’t respect the voters. Barack Obama passes that test with flying colors, but fails the respect for life test. His values are too far out of line for me to consider supporting him.

20 Responses to “Why Not Obama?”

  1. Jesse Says:

    Not to mention his awful foreign policy.

  2. wickle Says:

    There is that, but I don’t even have to get that far.

  3. mklasing Says:

    I feel your pain—I’m voting for McCain because a third party cannot win and of the 3 choices at the moment–he will do the least amount of damage. I hate to look at it that way–but I have to treat voting like running a business–sometimes you have to make a decision you don’t like–but it is the best one available.

  4. Larry Says:

    Thats it, that is all you can muster for a “good” reason to not back Obama? If EVERYONE I know was running for President I could come up with MUCH more definitive reasons to not support each and every one of them. Obama is clearly the best choice on the ballot this time around. I think you should stop pretending to be open-minded and just admit you would NEVER support a Democrat! Do not make the mistake of thinking that YOU love and care for LIFE MORE than Obama. Yeah, he a real evil man…

  5. wickle Says:

    Yes, Larry, I think that infanticide is bad. I didn’t know that I needed more than that. Look into BAIPA, and then come back and try talking to me.

    When you say he’s clearly the best choice … why?

    By the way, I voted for John Lynch, the Democratic governor of NH. He was manifestly better than Gov. Benson, the Republican incumbent. You can believe me or not, but there it is.

  6. Larry Says:

    OK, infantacide is bad…Do you know how many full grown living, loving carring, brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, husbands and wives will be victims of soldiaricide because you have a problem with a good man that dosent agree with you? I am certain there are MUCH BIGGER PROBLEMS in this world. I am very pro-Life, but I am human and I can SEE past my political nose.

    YES clearly, and you have allready answered “why” yourself.
    Barack Obama is honest. I think that he believes what he says, which is very different from other politicians, who will say anything to get elected.

    “The biggest thing that I admire about Sen. Obama is that he is a real person. He does not look down on voters, he does not patronize them. I don’t think that he views voters as commodities — as the things that you have to acquire in order to win the election. He views them as real people, and I’m convinced that he actually cares about having some kind of relationship with the human beings who are also voters.

    He is a man of good character.”
    COULDNT HAVE SAID IT BETTER MYSELF!

  7. econ grad stud Says:

    I’m not voting for Obama because he’s pro-abortion obviously.

    After that I’m discouraged by his dishonesty in using campaign rhetoric against NAFTA in Ohio but secretly telling Canadian embassadors he doesn’t mean any of it.

    If the Democrats ran Bob Casey I’d vote for him.

  8. in2thefray Says:

    @Larry how many soldiers and civilians will die with this http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/obamas_100_days.html . I personally could go on and on about how Obama is an elitist who does indeed look down on people.I could tell yo how is character is no better than most politicians in as much as his drive is more than what the kool aid drinking Obamaniacs want to admit. Canada story and lapel pin and Rezko are real issues folks,Somali dress up not.Race issues,law enforcement and immigration are real issues skin color shouldn’t be yet as it is sadi many times in many places. Barry O’Banyon from Chicago with the same oratory skills would still be in the Illinois State House.

  9. mklasing Says:

    Hey Larry: here are some of Obama’s highlights:
    1. Voted against the partial birth ban
    2. Voted against parental notification by minors trying to obtain abortions by traveling to other States.
    3. He wants to punish financial institutions for foreclosing on people who have defaulted on the mortgages (even though 99% of the time the loan was sold to that institution by a mortgage company)

    Shall I continue… why not?

    4. He equates the gay rights movement with the civil rights movement (nice slap in the face to African Americans)
    5. He thinks that tax cuts for the rich do not create jobs and instead wants to increase taxes on the rich–thereby punishing prosperity more than it is already punished.

    If this is not enough for you–check out the following:
    http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Barack_Obama.htm

    It’s all there and backed up. We have NEVER had someone SO liberal SO close to the White House–if you have any savings–I’d strongly consider moving it to another country.

  10. Jesse Says:

    larry, sorry to point the finger but….

    ” I think that he believes what he says, which is very different from other politicians”

    ummm…all i can think is george bush.
    i do not trust obama because all i have to do is look at who he surrounds himself with.

    same old gang. it is business as usual.

    no matter who gets elected right now we are going to have war and money will be tight. good luck!!

  11. pistolpete Says:

    While I share many of your concerns about Obama’s policies, I’m not convinced they are set in stone. I see him as a young, idealistic politician eager to please the public and bask in the glow of his cult status. I don’t think we really know how he would govern.

  12. wickle Says:

    Larry,

    We can have disagreements about policies of war and peace. But there is a fundamental, underlying philosophical problem that I have with a person who thinks, “Okay. Kill the 5-minute old child.” War has issues. I am repulsed by the term “collateral damage” as a sterilized euphemism for “innocent people whose deaths were immoral.”

    But there is no way to overlook the willingness to kill newborns.

    In2theFray has a point about NAFTA. I admit, I haven’t followed that issue much. I really haven’t looked much past the surface on Obama, for the simple reason that I didn’t need to — I know he’s unacceptable to me.

    As the election moves on to the general phase, though, I will be looking at him more.

    Econ Grad Student pointed out Bob Casey … I’d vote for him for President in a heartbeat. If you’re saying that I wouldn’t vote for any Democrat likely to get the nomination, then you’re right. But that isn’t something I worry about. I’m also not likely to vote for a Socialist, Libertarian, Communist, or Green Party nominee. The parties and I simply don’t line up on principles.

  13. wickle Says:

    Pistol Pete -

    I think that you have a point, there, and if he makes a change credibly, I might rethink it. But I’m not quite willing to bank on it.

  14. Kathy Says:

    Any person, regardless of sex, race political party, that supports the sucking out of brains of close to full term infants is not a person of good character.

  15. Where Jeremiah’s Right « A True Believer’s Weblog Says:

    [...] necessarily want to jump into this issue, for several reasons. First of all, I’ve made my position on Sen. Barack Obama as a Presidential candidate pretty clear, I think. My main choices are either [...]

  16. Fred Says:

    Larry, You are absolutely right on all counts!
    Thanks for enlightening me! These anti-antiists are so full of themselves that they cant see their own hyprocracy!
    Go Obama!

  17. Jesse Says:

    ~.wickle,
    so how do you like that choice you made on Gov. Lynch

    ~.pistolpete,
    “Obama’s policies, I’m not convinced they are set in stone”
    “eager to please the public”

    hillary and mccain wield power in a different way, no doubt.
    the thought that obama may be swayed one way or another is nice (..whether it be his ‘ideals’, voters, or just politics in general that persuade him..), but then again, democracy is dangerous too…so i am still concerned to say the least.

  18. Jonas Says:

    The born alive issue seems to be the strongest argument against Obama, but if you look up the already existing law in Illinois passed in 1975 regarding abortions it states

    “No abortion shall be performed or induced when the fetus is viable unless there is in attendance a physician other than the physician performing or inducing the abortion who shall take control of and provide immediate medical care for any child born alive as a result of the abortion.”

    These infants are already protected by a 30 year old law- the new law was unnecessary.

  19. wickle Says:

    Except, Jonas, that they weren’t protected.

    That’s why Jill Stanek reported about the deaths of newborns.

  20. lolol failed Says:

    uhhh i think this article sucks tbh, go home please


Leave a Reply