A very good night

Tonight is a very good night to be a Mike Huckabee supporter.

For months, we have been told that supporting Mike Huckabee was a bad thing — that we were dividing the social conservative vote and would throw the nomination to Rudy Giuliani if we didn’t bow out and get behind Mitt Romney.

Mitt Romney himself said that no candidate could be taken seriously without at least $20 million.

Tonight, no one can ignore Mike Huckabee.

Mitt Romney spent about 15 times as much as Mike Huckabee, and it looks like Iowans aren’t for sale. At this time, CNN is reporting about a 9-point lead, 34% to 25%. That has to hurt.

For Mike Huckabee, of course, this is a very big deal. You simply can’t ignore him anymore.

For Mitt Romney, this is also a very big deal. With major endorsements from all over the establishment in the GOP, he was still unable to pull out even a close second. Gov. Romney has to focus on New Hampshire now. If he loses in these two early races, he is probably done. He’s doing well in NH, but let me get back to that.

Fred Thompson pulled off a third place finish, about as far behind Romney as  Romney was behind Huckabee, at 13%.  This will keep Sen. Thompson in the game, if he can do well in South Carolina.

John McCain also pulled in about 13%, which he needs to use to make a good run in New Hampshire. This was a strong finish for him after many of us — and I’m among them — who thought that the immigration bill would have doomed him. He’s doing well in NH, and if he can pull off the win here, then he’s a force to be considered.

At long last, we have some idea what Ron Paul’s support looks like. For a candidate who has been ruled everywhere from longshot kook to front-runner,  10% is … well, … a number. We’ll see how that plays with the Ron Paul supporters. Certainly, a double-digit finish indicates that he has real support. But a 5th place finish in this first contest is hardly inspiring. It will be interesting to see what happens from here. New Hampshire will likely be better to Rep. Paul, with a much-stronger libertarian (and Libertarian) presence than Iowa. Rep. Paul also apparently carried a strong vote among younger voters — according to one report that I heard, he got more first-time voters than Gov. Romney did.

Rudy Giuliani didn’t really campaign in Iowa, saying that he was focusing on later states with more delegates. He also didn’t bother campaigning for the strongly conservative people of Iowa. A 4% finish is a problem for him now. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

With 1%, Duncan Hunter is now demonstrably in last place. I doubt that he will stay in through Super Tuesday. As did Tom Tancredo, I think that Rep. Hunter is going to find a candidate who is close to his values, and withdraw soon.

Listening to NPR, I have heard Rich Lowry of National Review, and I’ve been greatly enjoying it.

Rich Lowry, who endorsed Gov. Romney very recently, has acknowledged that this outcome is bad for Romney. According to Lowry, Romney loses momentum for the NH primary, and  it becomes likely that Sen. McCain will win the race here. Then, it lines up to a race of Huckabee, McCain, and Giuliani representing three different factions of the GOP — and he sees Sen. McCain having a very strong chance of becoming the new establishment/mainstream Republican candidate, an alternative to the social conservative/fiscal moderate Huckabee and social liberal/defense hawk Giuliani.

For now … it’s a very, very good night.

I do have some comments on the Democratic side of the game …

Hillary Clinton cannot possibly be happy with her third-place finish (even if it turns out to be second). Like Romney, she had a huge amount of pressure to win the early races. Negative momentum is going to hurt her badly. If she doesn’t win New Hampshire, then I think she’s done.

Barack Obama is charismatic, and should warrant a lot of attention. This could be very interesting. Like Huckabee, he won with a strong vote among young people — generally considered a losing strategy. This could prove very interesting.

Senators Chris Dodd and Joseph Biden have each withdrawn. This is too bad, really. Frankly, they had more experience and potential to lead than the three Democratic front-runners combined.

We will see how the rest of this plays out.

But for tonight, it is a very, very good night.

WordPress.com Political Blogger Alliance

10 Responses to “A very good night”

  1. tam Says:

    Congrats to you and all the other Huckabee supporters…

    I was very disappointed in Ron Paul’s showing (and shocked at Thompson & McCain!)

    I know he had more undeclared/independant support, but so did Obama. Since Obama took the dem contest (another shocker), I wonder of more of the undelcared when Dem the GOP this year.

    Biden and Dodds were ether only ones on the Dem side I could stomach, even a little (well Gravel but I don’t think he was on the ballet).

    yes, I am bummed… but happy for the Huckabee people (and at least he like FairTax).

  2. wickle Says:

    As a word of encouragement — Iowa isn’t great Libertarian territory. I would expect this result to be relatively good for Paul, and he can carry some positive momentum into NH.

    At least that’s my opinion right now. But it’s 1:15, so there’s no telling … ;-)

    And, yes, I’m afraid that the two Democrats who withdrew were the two best candidates they had. I guess that leaves Richardson.

    And thank you for the congrats.

  3. tam Says:

    Thanks for the encouragement, but we are more libertarian then most give us credit for (in the rural area)… I think the campaign (and many of the supporters) seriously dropped the ball on this.. they played into the stereo-type of Iowans instead of the truth!

    I know quite a few I convinced to support Ron Paul by simply mention items (or in some cases were against) he supports but were never really mentinoned… plus by explaining things that looked bad with just a sound bite.

    Some of them were things that matter stroinglky to us… but not mentioned by really anyone!

    You are more then welcome!

    And I am really now scared of the dems!

  4. Jamelle Says:

    Congrats Wickle. I know you must be quite pleased about tonight’s results.

    Here’s to an…interesting election season.

  5. Larry Says:

    Wickle,
    I believe I accidently deleted your comment on my blog post, instead of approving it. I went to read it again and I can’t find it. Please comment again and I will make sure it gets approved. Sorry about that.

  6. pistolpete Says:

    I add my own congrats to the others. While Huckabee is still taking a beating with the press (and hard-line Democrats like my secretary), he seems to be standing his ground quite well.

  7. onemom Says:

    the club for greed put out a release saying that the iowa results are “unacceptable” and that america must reject mike huckabee. Not surprisingly, they link to a wall street journal op-ed piece trashing huckabee and christians.

    the bottom-line for all of them is they want to protect the system that keeps them getting richer while the rest of us cry for crumbs outside their gold-laden doors.

    also an interesting poll from Zogby out today (it was completed yesterday BEFORE the caucuses started) … New Hampshire Poll - McCain 34%, Romney 30%, Huckabee 10%, Giuliani 9%. I can’t wait to see those numbers tomorrow.

  8. Rich Paul Says:

    One has to remember, when considering Ron Paul’s performance in Iowa, is that Iowa is full of Tax Farmers, who collect Welfare for not growing crops or growing crops that the world doesn’t need, or for other nutty things. It’s definitely hard for a pro-freedom candidate to do will in a state full of welfare queens. I was encouraged by the result, and hope to see him defeat even more candidates in the grown-up states, who are forced to pay for Iowa’s childish dependency.

    BTW, despite my name, I am not related to Ron Paul and my views are mine, not his.

  9. tam Says:

    Sigh Rich.. it is obvious that you know next to nothing about Iowans and simply believe in the stereo-type. Unfportunately, many of Ron pauls supporters had the same nutty opinions of Iowa which is one thing that really hurt us there.

    At ;east Huckabee supporters actually “get” Iowans.

  10. wickle Says:

    Rich, I’m going to offer a bit of advice … insulting people for not voting for your guy isn’t a great strategy.

    I defer to Tam’s knowledge of Iowa, but I have thought that NH has one of the strongest Libertarian populations in the country, which would be natural ground for Rep. Paul to do very well. The Free State Project is good for him, although the transplants from Taxachussetts will work against him.

    And, no, I didn’t assume that you were related to Rep. Paul.

    The results are “unacceptable”? Since when did they get to declare what was and wasn’t acceptable? I guess it’s a problem that the Christian voters want to be taken seriously?

Leave a Reply