A word or two about submission

Since we’re not going to discuss church doctrine in this election, I guess, Gov. Huckabee is now under fire for signing a Southern Baptist statement on the family that calls for women to submit to their husbands.

To be perfectly honest, this is one of the most disingenuous attacks yet. It involves all of the classic signs of being an unfair smear, but absolutely no one seems to care. Seeing this attack, again, come from Republicans who traditionally love to count on Christian votes helps confirm for me that the Republican Party isn’t a place welcoming to Christians. It’s also a sign that the Christian leadership is vacant — and that some of them have sold out Biblical truth for political convenience. By definition, every Biblical Christian in the country (and the world, for that matter) believes this teaching — it’s nothing that wasn’t written by the Apostle Paul himself.

Moreover, the attack involves pulling one sentence out of context. I could just as easily say that Mike Huckabee signed a statement that said:

The husband and wife are of equal worth before God, since both are created in God’s image. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to his people.

That’s from the same statement on the family. I don’t think that even the most strident feminist would be able to make any grounds for attack out of that sentence.

To put it back into context:

Article XVIII. The Family. The husband and wife are of equal worth before God, since both are created in God’s image. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to his people. A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family. A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ.

Suddenly, we Baptists look a lot less evil, don’t we? “Equal worth”? How does that mesh with the popular message being put out about how this is some repressive statement about men dominating women?

It doesn’t. That’s because that interpretation is either dishonest or based on insufficient information.

Considering the levels of Biblical literacy in the US, I’ll give most people the benefit of the doubt and go with the latter. However, the alleged Christian leaders who are participating in or allowing without challenge this particular attack are ignoring Scripture.

In Ephesians 5:22-33 we see (from the NIV translation, courtesy of Bible Gateway):

22Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.

25Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26to make her holy, cleansing[a] her by the washing with water through the word, 27and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29After all, no one ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cares for it, just as Christ does the church— 30for we are members of his body. 31“For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”[b] 32This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

Yes, my wife submits to me. That hardly means that I’m absolutely in charge or that her opinion isn’t valuable. What it means is that I have a whole lot of responsibilities to fulfill. My place in this command, as you notice, is to love my wife the way Jesus loves His Church. What, by the way, did Jesus do out of love for the Church? He was brutally flogged and nailed to a cross — willingly.

My place is to love my wife as much as He loves us. I am to lead family devotions, and to make sure that we as a family stay together in the Word and by spiritual times. This is absolutely not about me being the boss and her being subservient to me. This is about love, respect, and responsibilities. My wife and I have different roles within the marriage — they are each essential to the survival of our marriage and the building of our family.

The statement made by the Southern Baptists did nothing but confirm that they believe in the passage written in Ephesians.

Of course, those outside the faith might well look at this and not understand. That’s the case with most of Scripture. I expect that. For professed believers, though, to be making a political attack contrary to the clear Word, is a bigger problem.

If you want to imagine that the Bible is some kind of misogynistic document that tells men to oppress women, then nothing I can say is going to change that view. But let’s at least be honest about it. Every Republican and most of the Democrats running for President says that he or she is a Christian. Are we going to quiz them all about this passage out of Ephesians?

I thought that we weren’t having a referendum on religious theology.

This, by the way, is exactly why “Mother Jones” should not be given Mike Huckabee’s old sermons. One can only imagine how many one-sentence excerpts will be plucked from their context and used to malign him.

WordPress.com Political Blogger Alliance

10 Responses to “A word or two about submission”

  1. The Sphinx Says:

    “Yes, my wife submits to me. That hardly means that I’m absolutely in charge or that her opinion isn’t valuable”

    Spot on. You know, it’s very similar with Islam nowadays, where people falsely claim it’s a misogynist religion that “tells men to oppress women”. The same highlighting of single incidents of men oppressing their wives in Muslim-majority countries, and then again a complete disregard of the majority of Muslim men that treat their wives/daughters very well, and - even more importantly - passages of Islamic tradition stating the obvious:

    “The best among you are those who treat their wives best.” - Prophet Mohamed (One example of many)

    Anyway, there will always be people who don’t understand, and I understand very well why it ticks you off that they smear your faith because they even refuse to understand. Welcome to the club :)

  2. in2thefray Says:

    Completely unrelated sorry. My most recent America the…Needs a Leader. I take a poke at Huckabee. Given you being a fellow Alliance blogger I was wondering if you’d like to cough up a pro Huck link. Just wondering I2TF

  3. tam Says:

    While I do have issues with the underlying belief that, if I am understanding it correctly, basically says that both are equal, but have sperate and distinct responsibilities - I have no problem with Mike Huckabee believing that… it is his religion, as especially since he was a pastor, I would expect him to believe and follow the tnents of his religion.

    All I ask is he not force them onto me… and I really don’t think he would.

    I really wish they would all the rekigious discussion of the candidates, becuase their beliefs untimately don’t matter - what matters will they push those beliefs or legislate them.

  4. Justin Says:

    Here’s the problem. Just because you say you believe two things doesn’t mean you believe them–that you even can believe both at once. So here’s the challenge: I don’t think I should submit to my equals. Respect, sure, but submit, no. At least, I haven’t since I was an adult–when I was a child, maybe I submitted to my parents.

    So a wife submitting to her husband is not compatible with them being equals. Maybe it’ll be that they’re equals in God’s eyes, but feminists know that. The question that bothers them is equality in their own eyes, the eyes of their husbands and the eyes of society–because that’s what’s not acknowledged.

  5. Justin Says:

    Oops, I just saw my comment and realized “doesn’t mean that you do believe them” reads like it’s an accusation of dishonesty. Hopefully the following clause disambiguates it.

  6. wickle Says:

    Actually, it’s perfectly compatible with being equals — because the relationship is not based on power or control, it is very possible for two people to submit to each other.

    Back up one more verse to Ephesians 5:21:

    “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.”

    I submit to the same people who submit to me — because we aren’t about power over each other or control of each other, we’re about the relationship.

  7. wickle Says:

    No offense taken, Justin, I get what you mean.

    If I were to say, for example, “I believe firmly in the First Amendment, but nobody should be allowed to criticize the President because it’s un-American,” that would be an example of what you’re saying — the two ideas are mutually exclusive.

    Biblical submission is different from obeisance. Sadly, there are many Christians who don’t get that, either, which has led to a great many problems — which is why the SBC found it necessary to put forward this statement. It’s meant to drive home the idea of equal importance — even in a model of submission.

  8. tam Says:

    And many non-Christians don’t get it either, even with the statement issued. I still seer it as each has seorate difined rols.. something I am unconfortsable with.

    “He has the God-given responsibility to provide for, to protect, and to lead his family.”

    I think, more then anything the “lead” bothers me, the protect and orivuide for are lessor bothers…

    But then, let me restate - I disgree with the stance but am not bothered by the fact that Huckabee believes in it (I expect him to believe the tenents of his faith). I donlt think Hucakbee will try to legislate it (and thus force me to live by it) so I really donlt care what he believes…

    What scares me more is Romney’s talk about how every child need both parents and what he may do to promote that (as he uses that in his issue talk).

  9. wickle Says:

    Thanks, Tam — and sorry I missed your comment before. True to libertarian form, I guess you’re willing to live and let live, as long as he’s not bothering you, right? That makes sense … and I don’t think that there’s anything in Gov. Huckabee’s record to indicate that he’s tried to impose Biblical (or otherwise) wifely submission.

    I’m not sure I know what Romney would do to impose two-parent families, though … I have some laughable suggestions, but I’m pretty sure that none of them applies.

  10. Justin Says:

    It strikes me as a puzzling exegetical point for you that Ephesians 5:23-24 are asymmetrical–what explains that, if you’re taking 5:21 to be the important passage?

    Also, I would think that the relation between the church and Christ is not one of equality–it’s one based in God’s love for us, but it doesn’t strike me as equal.

    While I have no attachment to biblical literalism, I certainly hope that you’re right about what that passage means.

Leave a Reply